Samsung 970 Pro SSD review: The fastest M.2 NVMe drive yet - wilburnherivink

At a Glance

Proficient's Military rank

Pros

• Fastest M.2 NVMe SSD open
• Long-handled warranty and high TBW rating

Cons

• Substantially more expensive than the competition

Our Verdict

This is the fastest M.2 NVMe SSD available to the end-user, as healed as the priciest. Based on fast-writing MLC (2-bit) NAND, it's also long-lived. All things well thought out, it's the one you want if you have the wherewithal.

(Note: we've updated our review to reflect lower street pricing of the 970 Pro).

Worried can be the head that wears a crown, and lately that's been Samsung's crown when it comes to fastest M.2 NVMe SSD on the planet. The company barely held onto its headdress afterwards a challenge from the far-cheaper WD Black NVMe. A response was compulsory.

The retort is the Samsung 970 Professional, which is indeed the fastest M.2 NVMe SSD we've ever so tested. But while Samsung may rest bit easier, total relaxation isn't in the card game; the margin of victory over the WD Disastrous NVMe was hardly overwhelming. And, considering that the 970 Pro costs quite a bit more…

Still, the top never costs less, and the Samsung 970 Pro is what you want if you want the go-to-meeting.

Glasses, price, and warranty

The 970 Favoring is a M.2 2280 (22 millimeters fanlike, 80 mm long), NVMe drive that can utilize up astir four PCIe 3.0 lanes. "Up to" means it'll use them if you've got them, but can still function with two, albeit at more or less half the speed up. Father't bother with this private road unless you have those four lanes.

The drive uses Samsung's 64-layer MLC NAND, and the company's recently Phoenix control to get good manipulation of it. Merely the upshot of using quicker, less data dense (compared to 3-bit TLC) MLC NAND is that there's no 2TB version of the drive. On that point's also no 250GB version, though that's likely for performance reasons. With SSDs, few chips means fewer paths to shotgun information across, often sequent in slower write and take performance.

Thus if you wishing the 970 In favou (take it, you do) you'll be choosing from the $330 500GB version Oregon the $630 1TB version. The Samsung 970 EVO, also announced today, and the WD Black NVMe, cost around $100 fewer per 500GB of capacity. That's a difference of some 35 per centum. Quaff.

The good news is the 970 Pro's existent street price is a good clip lower at $250 for 512GB and $500 for 1TB. Unfortunately for the 970 Pro, the 970 Evo's street price is besides frown besides now with the 500GB repel at $200 and the 1TB version at $400. If you're bargain hunting, stop teasing yourself with this review and go read almost those.

If you're still with me, the 970 Professional is warrantied for a full five years, and rated for 300TBW (Terabytes Written) per 500GB of content, about the same American Samoa the 970 EVO and the WD Black NVMe. The TBW rating is the total come of data that the company says you can write to the drive in front you initiate losing too many cells.

Gnomish birds have told me that the industry is pretty conservative in those estimates, and if you divvy up those writes on a per twenty-four hours basis, the ratings are actually further more data than the the average user will write in ten years. We've yet to hit the cap on any SSD drive we've well-tried over the last few years.

Samsung 970 Pro performance

The 970 Pro is the fastest M.2 NVMe ride we've proved to date stamp. CrystalDiskMark 5 and 6, too American Samoa AS SSD 2.0 universally proclaimed so, besides American Samoa our real worldwide 48GB re-create tests. But the perimeter of victory over the 970 EVO and WD Black NVMe, as mentioned, was too close for comfort. Especially given the disparity in pricing. If this were a horse race, I'd articulate the 970 Pro won by two lengths at the wire, maximum.

IDG

The Samsung 970 In favou is clearly the best every-around M.2 NVMe according to CrystalDiskMark 6. Longer bars are better.

CrystalDiskMark 6 has changed from version 5 in that information technology now measures bantam file performance with various queue and thread depths. This gives a more surgical picture of what's going on at any presumption prison term on your PC during normal surgical process.

IDG

The 970 Pro didn't win all the Atomic number 3 SSD tests, merely it tested the better drive overall. Longer bars are best.

Our real life imitate tests, shown below, are designed simply to vertebral column up the conclusions of the artificial benchmarks, and spot if there are whatsoever major drop-offs during heavy end-user scenarios.

IDG

The 970 Pro was a trifle slow in the folder publish, simply submissive all told the other tests. In that location is a very large leeway of variation in that test. Shorter bars are better

It was hardly a blow-out, but the Samsung 970 In favour of proved quickest in well-nigh all the tests we ran. And the CrystalDiskMark 4K results with varied thread and queue depths clearly indicate that performance is well-balanced for most last-user workloads.

It's fastest

If you want the fastest M.2 NVMe SSD available, that's the Samsung 970 Pro—no ifs, ands, or buts. But a 35 percent premium is hefty for a take that's not all that much quicker than its rivals. Stoppage your wallet (and PCWorld's guide to the record-breaking SSDs) and make the call out.

Source: https://www.pcworld.com/article/401827/samsung-970-pro-ssd-review.html

Posted by: wilburnherivink.blogspot.com

Share this post